Experts backed new hospital on current site in 70-page report
- 70-page expert review report said A NEW HOSPITAL ON PART OF CURRENT HEMEL HOSPITAL SITE would be best option for future of NHS in Dacorum
- The report - the last independent review of sites - which lasted from 2016 to 2017 - was commissioned and paid for by Dacorum Council and the NHS
- Three top expert companies agreed the report
- The Council and the NHS have now DESTROYED the report
- BUT key parts of the report have been passed to Dacorum Health Action Group
- The report says a site on corner of King Harry Street and Hillfield Road would:
- be 'flexible to meet future demands and new services'
- allow 'sufficient parking area and easy access from King Harry Street and Hillfield Road'
- 'maximise the potential of the [Hospital] site with a new build development in one of the most accessible parts of the site'
- Despite the clear expert verdict, the Council and NHS press on with the Market Square site - rated ninth equal out of ten options in a later report
Bad news for Hospital closure backers as our campaign surges
- Politicians aiming to close Hemel Hospital get bad news today
- New Hospital Campaign/DHAG Facebook Group is growing fast
- Record numbers are joining the Group - 43 new members in just the last week
- Many joiners seem to be concerned at the plans to close Hermel Hospital and build a Hub instead
- What can YOU do to push back against the closure crew?
- ASK YOUR COUNCILLOR TO SAY 'NO' TO CLOSURE.
- AND NO TO PLANS FOR THE MARKET SQUARE HUB.
- You can make a difference. The Dacorum elections are set for May 2027, but we should start NOW demanding action to save our Hospital and build a new facility there.
- Here is a hint: some Council wards had a very low turnout at the last elections in 2023.
- Voters in those wards where turnout was low should exploit the chance to should get active and tell their councillors what they think of the closure plan.
- These are the five Dacorum wards with the lowest %age turnout 2023 - where a bigger turnout could threaten a surprise result:
- Highfield 20.51%
- Adeyfield East 22.13%
- Adeyfield West 22.71%
- Grovehill 23%
- Woodhall Farm 23.07%
Secret Hospital closure pact does not follow the rules, Council admits
- Council in secret agreement with NHS Trust over Hospital closure.
- Dacorum Council WON'T SAY what is in 'Memorandum of Understanding' (MoU) with the NHS.
- The secret pact was 'drafted but not signed', probably in 2024.
- Council says it has been 'working to the principles of the drafted MoU' in planning the closure of the Hospital and its replacement by a Market Square 'health centre'
- The MoU is 'not legally binding' - but the Council and NHS are following it anyway
- The Council has admitted to a DHAG member that the MoU 'sits outside the governance structures' of both the Council and NHS bodies
- WHY ARE COUNCILLORS NOT WILLING TO SAY WHAT IS IN THIS KEY AGREEMENT?
- WHY DOES THE AGREEMENT NOT FOLLOW THE NORMAL RULES GOVERNING THESE PUBLIC BODIES?
- WHY ARE THE HOSPITAL CLOSURE 'PARTNERS' FOLLOWING THE MOU WITHOUT SIGNING IT?
Council admits we had no say in Hospital closure decision - full letter
- Attached is the full response by a Dacorum Council officer to an FOI request about consultation on the closure of Hemel Hospital
- It makes clear that:
- The 'engagement' public sessions held earlier this year were ONLY to 'gather views on the overall vision and model of care'.
- So the decision to clear the Hospital site and build a Market Square Hub instead was taken WITHOUT PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
- The size of the main NHS facility in Dacorum will be reduced from 18 acres to just 1.3 acres
- This will severely limit future development of local healthcare facilities for the 160,000 people of Dacorum
- There will be no further work on any other option.
- The current Hemel Hospital site will be available for 450 or more flats.
- The Council claims that ANY public discussion of the factors behind the closure decision would be against its 'commercial interests'
Click below for the full response:
Council admits public had NO SAY in Hospital closure decision
- Dacorum Council ADMIT public were deliberately cut out of decision on Hemel Hospital closure
- They say 'Engagement' public sessions in the summer were just to 'gather views on the overall vision'
- This makes clear that the Prime Minister's promise (to David Taylor MP) of public consultation has been ignored
- Decision to make the closure the 'preferred way forward' was taken in private in May 2025 by UNELECTED Council and NHS bureaucrats, the 'Joint Strategic Board'.
- The final decision to replace the Hospital with a Hub was confirmed in 'private session' of some councillors last month.
- The Council said in an FOI response last week that
- The purpose of the ['engagement'] sessions was to gather views on the overall vision and model of care, rather than to consult formally on a single preferred site.
Has the NHS had second thoughts over Hemel Hospital closure?
- Has the NHS got cold feet over Hemel Hospital closure?
- Closure plan was not on the agenda at key NHS meeting last week
- The closure plan for Hemel Hospital was originally down for approval by the regional NHS ICB Board meeting which took place on 28 November.
- This would be a crucial step towards the shuttering of the 200-year-old institution
- BUT THE PLAN FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THE HOSPITAL AND ITS REPLACEMENT BY A MARKET SQUARE HUB OR 'NEIGHBOURHOOD' HEALTH CENTRE WAS NOT ON THE AGENDA AS PUBLISHED
- Has the NHS decided to rethink its plan to turn Hemel and Dacorum into a neighbourhood?
- OR - WAS THE CRUCIAL DECISION TAKEN IN SECRECY (PART TWO OF THE MEETING) AND NOT MADE PUBLIC?
- Dacorum Health Action Group has put in a Freedom of Information request to find out what happened
Council says 'commercial interests' mean reasons for Hospital closure must remain hidden
- Real reasons for Hospital closure decision kept secret to protect 'commercial interests' of West Herts Trust and Dacorum Council
- A member of Dacorum Health Action Group has been REFUSED answers to an FOI request about why the Council wants the Hospital is to be closed
- Official claimed reasons behind Hemel Hospital closure decision must be kept secret by Dacorum councillors 'as disclosure would be prejudicial to the commercial interests of the Council and its partners.'
- This information 'remains commercially sensitive and cannot be shared' according to the official
- Council response said: 'Option 4 - Market Square - was identified as the preferred way forward because of:
- the site’s ease of access,
- its alignment with the neighbourhood model of care,
- and its potential to support the future regeneration of the town centre.
- Nonsense ....
- The Market Square was rated JOINT NINTH out of ten options in the last independent expert survey on similar measures
- WHAT LIES BEHIND THIS NHS AND COUNCIL SECRECY?
- WHY ARE OUR COUNCILLORS SO KEEN TO SHUT OUR HOSPITAL WITHOUT TELLING US WHY?
Revealed - experts backed new building on Hemel Hospital site
- Report by three top independent firms backed state-of-the-art new local hospital building on Hemel Hospital site
- Expert report written the last time Hemel's hospital future was considered, between 2016 and 2018.
- At that time, Council and NHS rated Market Square site joint NINTH OUT OF TEN options
- Dacorum Council and NHS may have deleted or destroyed the expert report, which they helped to pay for - they claim they don't have it
- BUT PARTS OF THE EXPERT REPORT HAVE NOW BEEN HANDED TO DACORUM HEALTH ACTION GROUP
- Report assesses the site for a local hospital with services very similar to the planned 'Hemel Health Campus'
- Priorities would be prevention, integration and care closer to home
- Experts said the 'optimum proposal' for a new local hospital on the current site was on the northwestern edge, because it:
- Was 'Close to the town centre'
- 'Allows for sufficient parking and easy access from King Harry Street and Hillfield Road'
- Was 'flexible to meet future demands and new services'
- 'Optimises the value of the [current Hospital] land'
- The report assumed the rest of the current Hospital site would be used for housing to meet Government targets, and a school
No discussion as NHS bosses confirm Hemel Hospital closure decision
- West Herts NHS Trust bosses confirmed yesterday that they will seek the closure of Hemel Hospital and its replacement with a Market Square Hub
- There was NO DISCUSSION at the Trust Board meeting which in a few minutes approved a business case for the £134.8m project
- The only public information was in 15 slides with no financial figures and no details on options such as the use of the current site
- The promotional 'engagement' sessions did not discuss options and provided no financial information on the Hub
- Just over three years ago, the same Trust provided 183 pages of background information on the various options for Watford General, including full and detailed responses from the public
- THE TRUST TAKE WATFORD SERIOUSLY. WHEN IT COMES TO DACORUM, THEY ARE JUST PR PEOPLE. DACORUM COUNCIL ARE SUPPORTING THEM IN THEIR COVER UP.
- These are the May 2022 West Herts Trust board papers on the Watford General project (pages 7 to 190):
- https://www.westhertshospitals.nhs.uk/application/files/7117/3677/6007/May_2022_board_papers2.pdf
We are consulted on waste recycling centres - but not on the Hospital
- Herts County Council are consulting the public on changes to the way waste recycling centres are run
- A range of options are available for the public to say which policy they favour
- BUT DACORUM AND THE NHS ARE GOING AHEAD WITH THE CLOSURE OF HEMEL HOSPITAL - WITHOUT CONSULTATION
- Keir Starmer promised David Taylor MP in June that there would be public consultation
- But the authorities decided to ignore the PM's pledge and move to closure
- No options are offered beyond the cramped and expensive Hub on Market Square
- The promotional material for the Hub on the Dacorum website gives the game away:
- "we’ll be seeking your feedback and thoughts on the health campus to shape our thinking and approach – and would value your views on this option. This will then be considered against other alternatives in the Strategic Outline Case."
- This is the arrogant policy of TAKE OR LEAVE IT










